OnePlus releases statement about clipboard data accusation


We’ve learned in the past few years how much of a double-edged sword the internet could be with how quickly stories can go viral or be blown out of proportion. Last time, a particular Twitter user thought he found information that proved OnePlus was sending usage stats to a server in China. While he did find the framework for a system app to send this information. It was actually disabled and inactive.

The same Twitter user uncovers similar information when (seemingly) messing with a decompiled version of the clipboard app. Unfortunately, the OP only provided the framework and code but was not able to make the code actually do what he claimed it was doing.

Basically, there was a file within the clipboard app that would identify what kind of data was copied to the clipboard including a list of phrases called “badwords.txt” and had a method of identifying bank account numbers.

Android Police reached out to OnePlus for further explanation, to which OnePlus provided to following statement:

After OnePlus’ statement, the original poster tweeted the following:

It turns out that the information uncovered by the Twitter user was all inactive, residual code from Hydrogen OS, the software found only on Chinese OnePlus devices. It also turns out that the badwords.txt file was actually a blacklist that were compared to the data in the clipboard, and if the clipboard contained any of these phrases, it would not be sent to this server in China. Of course, rules about electronic data privacy are quite different in China.

It’s also worth noting that this code was found on the Oxygen OS open beta, which means it more than likely would not have made it to the final build of Oxygen OS. With this happening for a second time, it seems that OnePlus should perhaps make more of an effort to keep both global and Chinese firmware separate so that a misunderstanding like this one wouldn’t happen again.

It’s not to say that OnePlus is totally off the hook, or any other phone maker for that matter. We just have to be careful about these kinds of accusations that show us pieces of a puzzle that don’t actually fit together to paint the assumed picture – at least not without asking for a second opinion.


Let’s block ads! (Why?) – Latest articles

Get real time updates directly on you device, subscribe now.

Subscribe to our newsletter
Sign up here to get the latest news, updates and special offers delivered directly to your inbox.
You can unsubscribe at any time
You might also like

Leave A Reply

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More